↓ Skip to main content

Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
59 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
23 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids
Published in
Science, March 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aal1979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kun-Ta Wu, Jean Bernard Hishamunda, Daniel T N Chen, Stephen J DeCamp, Ya-Wen Chang, Alberto Fernández-Nieves, Seth Fraden, Zvonimir Dogic

Abstract

Transport of fluid through a pipe is essential for the operation of macroscale machines and microfluidic devices. Conventional fluids only flow in response to external pressure. We demonstrate that an active isotropic fluid, composed of microtubules and molecular motors, autonomously flows through meter-long three-dimensional channels. We establish control over the magnitude, velocity profile, and direction of the self-organized flows and correlate these to the structure of the extensile microtubule bundles. The inherently three-dimensional transition from bulk-turbulent to confined-coherent flows occurs concomitantly with a transition in the bundle orientational order near the surface and is controlled by a scale-invariant criterion related to the channel profile. The nonequilibrium transition of confined isotropic active fluids can be used to engineer self-organized soft machines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 265 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 28%
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Master 29 11%
Professor 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 105 39%
Engineering 42 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Chemical Engineering 12 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 240. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#158,569
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,811
of 83,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,416
of 323,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#102
of 1,221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.