↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver
Published in
Nature, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature21729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keren Bahar Halpern, Rom Shenhav, Orit Matcovitch-Natan, Beáta Tóth, Doron Lemze, Matan Golan, Efi E. Massasa, Shaked Baydatch, Shanie Landen, Andreas E. Moor, Alexander Brandis, Amir Giladi, Avigail Stokar-Avihail, Eyal David, Ido Amit, Shalev Itzkovitz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#658,504
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#25,543
of 91,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,337
of 308,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#543
of 888 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 888 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.