↓ Skip to main content

Techniques for epicardial mapping and ablation with a miniature robotic walker

Overview of attention for article published in Robotic Surgery Research and Reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Techniques for epicardial mapping and ablation with a miniature robotic walker
Published in
Robotic Surgery Research and Reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/rsrr.s127047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dwight A Meglan, Wener Lv, Richard J Cohen, Cameron N Riviere

Abstract

Present treatments for ventricular tachycardia have significant drawbacks. To ameliorate these drawbacks, it may be advantageous to employ an epicardial robotic walker that performs mapping and ablation with precise control of needle insertion depth. This paper examines the feasibility of such a system. This paper describes techniques for epicardial mapping and depth-controlled ablation with the robotic walker. The mapping technique developed for the current form of the system uses a single equivalent moving dipole model combined with the navigation capability of the walker. The intervention technique provides saline-enhanced radio frequency ablation, with sensing of needle penetration depth. The mapping technique was demonstrated in an artificial heart model with a simulated arrhythmia focus, followed by preliminary testing in the porcine model in vivo. The ablation technique was demonstrated in an artificial tissue model, and then in chicken breast tissue ex vivo. The walker located targets to within 2 mm using the SEMDM technique. No epicardial damage was found subsequent to the porcine trial in vivo. Needle insertion for ablation was controlled to within 2 mm of the target depth. Lesion size was repeatable, with diameter varying consistently in proportion to volume of saline injected. The experiments demonstrated the general feasibility of the techniques for mapping and depth-controlled ablation with the robotic walker.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,009,834
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Robotic Surgery Research and Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,769
of 327,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Robotic Surgery Research and Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them