↓ Skip to main content

Current knowledge on diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 806)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current knowledge on diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10555-011-9292-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kjell Öberg, Daniel Castellano

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a heterogeneous group of malignancies with various clinical presentations and growth rates. The incidence has been estimated to 2.5-5 per 100,000 people per year and prevalence of 35 per 100,000. The largest group is the gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Small intestinal NETs are the most common followed by pancreatic NETs in the gastrointestinal tract. A classification system (World Health Organization) was established in year 2000 and recently updated in 2010, taking into consideration the histopathology and tumor biology of the tumors. To further refine the classification a "tumor node metastasis" staging has been suggested by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. The same organization has also proposed a grading system (G1, G2, and G3). The diagnosis of a NET is based on histopathology on tumor specimens, circulating biomarkers as well as imaging. Traditional radiology, such as computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, is still the basis but is complemented with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and positron emission tomography with specific isotopes such (68)Ga-DOTA-octreotate, F18-dopamine, or C11-5 hydroxytryptamine. Molecular imaging will increase in importance in the near future. There is still an unmet need for more sensitive biomarkers for diagnosis and follow-up.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,271,755
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#39
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,797
of 184,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.