The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 467 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature12540 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camilo Mora, Abby G. Frazier, Ryan J. Longman, Rachel S. Dacks, Maya M. Walton, Eric J. Tong, Joseph J. Sanchez, Lauren R. Kaiser, Yuko O. Stender, James M. Anderson, Christine M. Ambrosino, Iria Fernandez-Silva, Louise M. Giuseffi, Thomas W. Giambelluca |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 5% |
| Australia | 16 | 3% |
| Jamaica | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 11 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 4 | <1% |
| Singapore | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 43 | 9% |
| Unknown | 296 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 387 | 83% |
| Scientists | 50 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 2% |
| Canada | 15 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 1% |
| Australia | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| India | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 40 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1251 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 342 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 288 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 156 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 6% |
| Professor | 70 | 5% |
| Other | 257 | 19% |
| Unknown | 180 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 330 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 318 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 252 | 18% |
| Engineering | 56 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 2% |
| Other | 154 | 11% |
| Unknown | 231 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#13,773
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,371
of 100,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54
of 224,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#10
of 1,069 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,069 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.