You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003480 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lutz Bornmann, Gerlind Wallon, Anna Ledin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 76 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
Professor | 9 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 16 | 18% |
Computer Science | 12 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 24% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#20,655,889
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#180,500
of 220,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,459
of 102,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#357
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.