↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of outcomes between conventional lumbar fenestration discectomy and minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: an observational study with a minimum 2-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 119)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of outcomes between conventional lumbar fenestration discectomy and minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: an observational study with a minimum 2-year follow-up
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-8-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiju A Majeed, C S Vikraman, Vivek Mathew, Anish T S

Abstract

Different surgical techniques for lumbar discectomy are in vogue. This study compares the outcomes of two techniques for lumbar discectomy, viz. micro lumbar discectomy (LD) and conventional fenestration discectomy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#1,634,836
of 3,634,915 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#32
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,265
of 95,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,634,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 53rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.