You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conceptualizing Community Mobilization for HIV Prevention: Implications for HIV Prevention Programming in the African Context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0078208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheri A. Lippman, Suzanne Maman, Catherine MacPhail, Rhian Twine, Dean Peacock, Kathleen Kahn, Audrey Pettifor |
| Abstract |
Community mobilizing strategies are essential to health promotion and uptake of HIV prevention. However, there has been little conceptual work conducted to establish the core components of community mobilization, which are needed to guide HIV prevention programming and evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| South Africa | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 47 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2013.
All research outputs
#4,103,275
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#50,647
of 220,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,369
of 218,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,138
of 5,131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.