↓ Skip to main content

A Neuron-Based Screening Platform for Optimizing Genetically-Encoded Calcium Indicators

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Neuron-Based Screening Platform for Optimizing Genetically-Encoded Calcium Indicators
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trevor J. Wardill, Tsai-Wen Chen, Eric R. Schreiter, Jeremy P. Hasseman, Getahun Tsegaye, Benjamin F. Fosque, Reza Behnam, Brenda C. Shields, Melissa Ramirez, Bruce E. Kimmel, Rex A. Kerr, Vivek Jayaraman, Loren L. Looger, Karel Svoboda, Douglas S. Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 171 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 25%
Researcher 43 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 30%
Neuroscience 48 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Chemistry 7 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 25 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,726,082
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#82,905
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,169
of 228,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,255
of 5,259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.