↓ Skip to main content

What do letters to the editor publish about randomized controlled trials? A cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What do letters to the editor publish about randomized controlled trials? A cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-6-414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika Kastner, Anita Menon, Sharon E Straus, Andreas Laupacis

Abstract

To identify published letters to the editor (LTE) written in response to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), determine the topics addressed in the letters, and to examine if these topics were affected by the characteristics and results of the RCTs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 53%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,820,309
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,257
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,423
of 213,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#18
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.