You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trichome structure and evolution in Neotropical lianas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mct201 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anselmo Nogueira, Juliana Hanna Leite El Ottra, Elza Guimarães, Silvia Rodrigues Machado, Lúcia G. Lohmann |
| Abstract |
Trichomes are epidermal outgrowths generally associated with protection against herbivores and/or desiccation that are widely distributed from ferns to angiosperms. Patterns of topological variation and morphological evolution of trichomes are still scarce in the literature, preventing valid comparisons across taxa. This study integrates detailed morphoanatomical data and the evolutionary history of the tribe Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae) in order to gain a better understanding of current diversity and evolution of trichome types. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,657,497
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,811
of 3,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,684
of 205,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#40
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.