↓ Skip to main content

A Detailed Epidemiological and Clinical Description of 6 Human Cases of Avian-Origin Influenza A (H7N9) Virus Infection in Shanghai

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Detailed Epidemiological and Clinical Description of 6 Human Cases of Avian-Origin Influenza A (H7N9) Virus Infection in Shanghai
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jindong Shi, Juan Xie, Zebao He, Yunwen Hu, Yanchao He, Qihui Huang, Beizheng Leng, Wei He, Ying Sheng, Fangming Li, Yuanlin Song, Chunxue Bai, Yong Gu, Zhijun Jie

Abstract

The world's first reported patient infected with avian influenza H7N9 was treated at the Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai. Shortly thereafter, several other cases emerged in the local area. Here, we describe the detailed epidemiological and clinical data of 6 cases of avian influenza H7N9.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,221,240
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,380
of 193,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,203
of 210,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,054
of 5,138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.