↓ Skip to main content

The expanding spectrum of rare monogenic autoinflammatory diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The expanding spectrum of rare monogenic autoinflammatory diseases
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-8-162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Touitou, Caroline Galeotti, Linda Rossi-Semerano, Véronique Hentgen, Maryam Piram, Isabelle Koné-Paut, for the CeRéMAI, French reference center for autoinflammatory diseases

Abstract

Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases are a group of hereditary disorders characterized by a clinical and biological inflammatory syndrome in which there is little or no evidence of autoimmunity. The discovery of the first causative gene in 1997 was rapidly followed by the identification of many others from the same group. The mutated proteins can be directly or indirectly involved in the regulation of inflammation. The available literature includes numerous reviews, which address the principle diseases, but we wanted to focus on the most recent rare syndromes. A comprehensive review is thus provided, including taxonomic, genetic, and epidemiological data, along with characteristics defining positive and differential diagnoses and treatment. We believe that this update will assist physicians in correctly naming their patient's illness. This is an essential step for the effective and targeted management of an orphan disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#946
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,379
of 223,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#20
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.