↓ Skip to main content

Chronic low back pain patient groups in primary care – A cross sectional cluster analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic low back pain patient groups in primary care – A cross sectional cluster analysis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Viniol, Nikita Jegan, Oliver Hirsch, Corinna Leonhardt, Markus Brugger, Konstantin Strauch, Jürgen Barth, Erika Baum, Annette Becker

Abstract

Due to the heterogeneous nature of chronic low back pain (CLBP), it is necessary to identify patient groups and evaluate treatments within these groups. We aimed to identify groups of patients with CLBP in the primary care setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 18%
Psychology 9 18%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,391,241
of 12,254,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#813
of 2,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,843
of 164,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#18
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,254,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.