↓ Skip to main content

Association of Cyclooxygenase-1-Dependent and -Independent Platelet Function Assays With Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Aspirin-Treated Patients Presenting for Cardiac Catheterization

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Cyclooxygenase-1-Dependent and -Independent Platelet Function Assays With Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Aspirin-Treated Patients Presenting for Cardiac Catheterization
Published in
Circulation, December 2009
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.109.900589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew L. Frelinger, YouFu Li, Matthew D. Linden, Marc R. Barnard, Marsha L. Fox, Douglas J. Christie, Mark I. Furman, Alan D. Michelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 12 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 12 28%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,054,039
of 9,272,034 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#7,493
of 9,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,140
of 260,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#173
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,272,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.