You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cephalic versus oronasal mask for noninvasive ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1327-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Cuvelier, Wilfried Pujol, Stéphanie Pramil, Luis Carlos Molano, Catherine Viacroze, Jean-François Muir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 27% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,862
of 5,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,312
of 90,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.