You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis Onset: Evaluation Based on Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0077766 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paolo Pellegrino, Carla Carnovale, Valentina Perrone, Marco Pozzi, Stefania Antoniazzi, Emilio Clementi, Sonia Radice |
| Abstract |
To evaluate epidemiological features of post vaccine acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) by considering data from different pharmacovigilance surveillance systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 67 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 171 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 259 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 4% |
| Scientists | 4 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#190,257
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,820
of 225,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,302
of 224,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#64
of 5,159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.