You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
No Association between Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Gene Polymorphisms and Experimentally Elicited Social Preferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Coren L. Apicella, David Cesarini, Magnus Johannesson, Christopher T. Dawes, Paul Lichtenstein, Björn Wallace, Jonathan Beauchamp, Lars Westberg |
| Abstract |
Oxytocin (OXT) has been implicated in a suite of complex social behaviors including observed choices in economic laboratory experiments. However, actual studies of associations between oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene variants and experimentally elicited social preferences are rare. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 28% |
| Researcher | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 64 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,700,887
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,653
of 193,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,448
of 83,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#651
of 715 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 715 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.