↓ Skip to main content

Reconstructing the Genomic Content of Microbiome Taxa through Shotgun Metagenomic Deconvolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstructing the Genomic Content of Microbiome Taxa through Shotgun Metagenomic Deconvolution
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rogan Carr, Shai S. Shen-Orr, Elhanan Borenstein

Abstract

Metagenomics has transformed our understanding of the microbial world, allowing researchers to bypass the need to isolate and culture individual taxa and to directly characterize both the taxonomic and gene compositions of environmental samples. However, associating the genes found in a metagenomic sample with the specific taxa of origin remains a critical challenge. Existing binning methods, based on nucleotide composition or alignment to reference genomes allow only a coarse-grained classification and rely heavily on the availability of sequenced genomes from closely related taxa. Here, we introduce a novel computational framework, integrating variation in gene abundances across multiple samples with taxonomic abundance data to deconvolve metagenomic samples into taxa-specific gene profiles and to reconstruct the genomic content of community members. This assembly-free method is not bounded by various factors limiting previously described methods of metagenomic binning or metagenomic assembly and represents a fundamentally different approach to metagenomic-based genome reconstruction. An implementation of this framework is available at http://elbo.gs.washington.edu/software.html. We first describe the mathematical foundations of our framework and discuss considerations for implementing its various components. We demonstrate the ability of this framework to accurately deconvolve a set of metagenomic samples and to recover the gene content of individual taxa using synthetic metagenomic samples. We specifically characterize determinants of prediction accuracy and examine the impact of annotation errors on the reconstructed genomes. We finally apply metagenomic deconvolution to samples from the Human Microbiome Project, successfully reconstructing genus-level genomic content of various microbial genera, based solely on variation in gene count. These reconstructed genera are shown to correctly capture genus-specific properties. With the accumulation of metagenomic data, this deconvolution framework provides an essential tool for characterizing microbial taxa never before seen, laying the foundation for addressing fundamental questions concerning the taxa comprising diverse microbial communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 6%
Brazil 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 224 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 28%
Researcher 60 24%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 15 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 18%
Computer Science 19 7%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Mathematics 9 4%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 18 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,304,011
of 25,956,379 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,057
of 9,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,581
of 226,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#13
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,956,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.