↓ Skip to main content

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design
Published in
Trials, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriela J Prutsky, Juan Pablo Domecq, Patricia J Erwin, Matthias Briel, Victor M Montori, Elie A Akl, Joerg J Meerpohl, Dirk Bassler, Stefan Schandelmaier, Stephen D Walter, Qi Zhou, Pablo Alonso Coello, Lorenzo Moja, Martin Walter, Kristian Thorlund, Paul Glasziou, Regina Kunz, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, Jason Busse, Xin Sun, Annette Kristiansen, Benjamin Kasenda, Osama Qasim-Agha, Gennaro Pagano, Hector Pardo-Hernandez, Gerard Urrutia, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Gordon Guyatt

Abstract

Randomized control trials (RCTs) stopped early for benefit (truncated RCTs) are increasingly common and, on average, overestimate the relative magnitude of benefit by approximately 30%. Investigators stop trials early when they consider it is no longer ethical to enroll patients in a control group. The goal of this systematic review is to determine how investigators of ongoing or planned RCTs respond to the publication of a truncated RCT addressing a similar question.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Other 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Professor 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 56%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%