↓ Skip to main content

Impact of microRNAs on regulatory networks and pathways in human colorectal carcinogenesis and development of metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of microRNAs on regulatory networks and pathways in human colorectal carcinogenesis and development of metastasis
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Pizzini, Andrea Bisognin, Susanna Mandruzzato, Marta Biasiolo, Arianna Facciolli, Lisa Perilli, Elisabetta Rossi, Giovanni Esposito, Massimo Rugge, Pierluigi Pilati, Simone Mocellin, Donato Nitti, Stefania Bortoluzzi, Paola Zanovello

Abstract

Qualitative alterations or abnormal expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in colon cancer have mainly been demonstrated in primary tumors. Poorly overlapping sets of oncomiRs, tumor suppressor miRNAs and metastamiRs have been linked with distinct stages in the progression of colorectal cancer. To identify changes in both miRNA and gene expression levels among normal colon mucosa, primary tumor and liver metastasis samples, and to classify miRNAs into functional networks, in this work miRNA and gene expression profiles in 158 samples from 46 patients were analysed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 89 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Other 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 11 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2013.
All research outputs
#10,969,531
of 12,378,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,358
of 7,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,527
of 169,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#162
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,378,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.