You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Community resource centres to improve the health of women and children in Mumbai slums: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neena Shah More, Sushmita Das, Ujwala Bapat, Mahesh Rajguru, Glyn Alcock, Wasundhara Joshi, Shanti Pantvaidya, David Osrin |
| Abstract |
The trial addresses the general question of whether community resource centers run by a non-government organization improve the health of women and children in slums. The resource centers will be run by the Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, and the trial will evaluate their effects on a series of public health indicators. Each resource center will be located in a vulnerable Mumbai slum area and will serve as a base for salaried community workers, supervised by officers and coordinators, to organize the collection and dissemination of health information, provision of services, home visits to identify and counsel families at risk, referral of individuals and families to appropriate services and support for their access, meetings of community members and providers, and events and campaigns on health issues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 18% |
| Researcher | 48 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 105 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 13% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 119 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,462,378
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#24
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,101
of 207,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.