↓ Skip to main content

What are the consequences of fish entrainment and impingement associated with hydroelectric dams on fish productivity? A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are the consequences of fish entrainment and impingement associated with hydroelectric dams on fish productivity? A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0087-x
Authors

Trina Rytwinski, Dirk A. Algera, Jessica J. Taylor, Karen E. Smokorowski, Joseph R. Bennett, Philip M. Harrison, Steven J. Cooke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Bachelor 6 22%
Student > Master 5 19%
Unspecified 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Unspecified 6 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,232,748
of 13,304,005 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#122
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,035
of 262,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,304,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them