↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship between Telomere Length and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relationship between Telomere Length and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035567
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jee Lee, Andrew J. Sandford, John E. Connett, Jin Yan, Tammy Mui, Yuexin Li, Denise Daley, Nicholas R. Anthonisen, Angela Brooks-Wilson, S. F. Paul Man, Don D. Sin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,929,390
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,335
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,988
of 179,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,921
of 3,798 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,798 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.