You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Currency for Offsetting Energy Development Impacts: Horse-Trading Sage-Grouse on the Open Market
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0010339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin E. Doherty, David E. Naugle, Jeffrey S. Evans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,871
of 195,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,704
of 96,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#349
of 692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.