↓ Skip to main content

Translational evidence for the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in stress-related psychiatric illnesses

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Translational evidence for the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in stress-related psychiatric illnesses
Published in
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-5380-3-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew N Hill, Sachin Patel

Abstract

Accumulating evidence over the past decade has highlighted an important role of the endocannabinoid (eCB) system in the regulation of stress and emotional behavior across divergent species, from rodents to humans. The general findings from this work indicate that the eCB system plays an important role in gating and buffering the stress response, dampening anxiety and regulating mood. Work in rodents has allowed researchers to determine the neural mechanisms mediating this relationship while work in human populations has demonstrated the possible importance of this system in stress-related psychiatric diseases, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety and major depression. These stress-protective effects of eCB signaling appear to be primarily mediated by their actions within corticolimbic structures, particularly the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date discussion of the current level of knowledge in this field, as well as address the current gaps in knowledge and specific areas of research that require attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 177 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 37 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Psychology 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#569,096
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#2
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,702
of 224,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them