You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2661-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonie Haverkamp, Teus J. Weijs, Pieter C. van der Sluis, Ingeborg van der Tweel, Jelle P. Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg |
| Abstract |
The possible advantages of laparoscopic (assisted) total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) have not been reviewed systematically. The aim of this study was to systematically review the short-term outcomes of LTG versus OTG in the treatment of gastric cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Morocco | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Yemen | 1 | 1% |
| Croatia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 26% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,351,676
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,737
of 6,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,650
of 278,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#86
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,011 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.