You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complete Factor I Deficiency Due to Dysfunctional Factor I with Recurrent Aseptic Meningo-Encephalitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Immunology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10875-013-9944-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filomeen Haerynck, Patrick Stordeur, Johan Vandewalle, Rudy Van Coster, Victoria Bordon, Frans De Baets, Petra Schelstraete, Cédric Javaux, Marie-Rose Bouvry, Véronique Fremeaux-Bacchi, Joke Dehoorne |
| Abstract |
Complement regulators control the activated complement system. Defects in this homeostasis can result in tissue damage and autoimmune diseases with a heterogeneity in clinical presentation. Complement factor I (FI), a serine protease, is an important regulator of alternative pathway activation. We report a diagnostic work-up of a patient with relapsing inflammatory mediated meningo-encephalitis. Our work-up revealed a rare genetic factor I (FI) deficiency. So far, all cases of reported complete factor I deficiency have absent serum levels of FI. We present here a unique case of a complete factor I deficiency based on a functional FI defect. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 17% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1,254
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,794
of 211,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.