↓ Skip to main content

Lack of acclimation in Ophionotus victoriae: brittle stars are not fish

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lack of acclimation in Ophionotus victoriae: brittle stars are not fish
Published in
Polar Biology, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00300-008-0532-y
Authors

Lloyd S. Peck, Alison Massey, Michael A. S. Thorne, Melody S. Clark

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Argentina 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 83 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 48%
Environmental Science 15 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,928,300
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#219
of 1,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,339
of 92,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.