↓ Skip to main content

Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006823.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R Thomson, Hazim Sadideen, Dominic Furniss

Abstract

Axillary dissection is commonly performed for breast carcinoma. It is uncertain whether insertion of a drain reduces complication rates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Unspecified 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 24 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Unspecified 9 15%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,860,097
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,909
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,656
of 176,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.