You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006823.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David R Thomson, Hazim Sadideen, Dominic Furniss |
| Abstract |
Axillary dissection is commonly performed for breast carcinoma. It is uncertain whether insertion of a drain reduces complication rates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 69 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 70 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,830,692
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,261
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,105
of 225,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#207
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.