The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
『金瓶梅』の年中行事宴会を通して見る住まいにおける諸場所の意味
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3130/aija.80.2355 |
| Authors |
Natsuki KAMI |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 28 | 16% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 178 | 99% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#312,860
of 26,352,912 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,148
of 294,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them