↓ Skip to main content

Greater role for Atlantic inflows on sea-ice loss in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
37 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Greater role for Atlantic inflows on sea-ice loss in the Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean
Published in
Science, April 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aai8204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor V. Polyakov, Andrey V. Pnyushkov, Matthew B. Alkire, Igor M. Ashik, Till M. Baumann, Eddy C. Carmack, Ilona Goszczko, John Guthrie, Vladimir V. Ivanov, Torsten Kanzow, Richard Krishfield, Ronald Kwok, Arild Sundfjord, James Morison, Robert Rember, Alexander Yulin

Abstract

Arctic sea-ice loss is a leading indicator of climate change and can be attributed, in large part, to atmospheric forcing. Here, we show that recent ice reductions, weakening of the halocline, and shoaling of intermediate-depth Atlantic Water layer in the eastern Eurasian Basin have increased winter ventilation in the ocean interior, making this region structurally similar to that of the western Eurasian Basin. The associated enhanced release of oceanic heat has reduced winter sea-ice formation at a rate now comparable to losses from atmospheric thermodynamic forcing, thus explaining the recent reduction in sea-ice cover in the eastern Eurasian Basin. This encroaching "atlantification" of the Eurasian Basin represents an essential step toward a new Arctic climate state, with a substantially greater role for Atlantic inflows.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 26%
Unspecified 24 14%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 79 46%
Unspecified 30 18%
Environmental Science 30 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 7 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 374. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#25,553
of 12,555,175 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,168
of 59,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,486
of 257,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#62
of 947 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,555,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 947 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.