↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity Risks from Fossil Fuel Extraction

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
134 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Biodiversity Risks from Fossil Fuel Extraction
Published in
Science, October 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1237261
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Butt, H. L. Beyer, J. R. Bennett, D. Biggs, R. Maggini, M. Mills, A. R. Renwick, L. M. Seabrook, H. P. Possingham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 3%
United States 4 2%
Italy 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 197 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 24%
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Professor 13 6%
Other 56 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 37%
Environmental Science 72 32%
Unspecified 19 9%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Other 34 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#99,287
of 12,384,948 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,829
of 58,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,405
of 172,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#82
of 893 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,384,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 893 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.