You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geir Kjetil Sandve, Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor, Eivind Hovig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 725 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 167 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 46 | 6% |
| France | 31 | 4% |
| Germany | 30 | 4% |
| Canada | 26 | 4% |
| Spain | 17 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 15 | 2% |
| Australia | 12 | 2% |
| Japan | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 134 | 18% |
| Unknown | 237 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 420 | 58% |
| Scientists | 283 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,789 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 63 | 4% |
| Germany | 14 | <1% |
| Brazil | 14 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | <1% |
| Spain | 11 | <1% |
| France | 10 | <1% |
| Canada | 7 | <1% |
| Denmark | 6 | <1% |
| Sweden | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 52 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1594 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 478 | 27% |
| Researcher | 418 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 194 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 114 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 85 | 5% |
| Other | 308 | 17% |
| Unknown | 192 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 491 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 209 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 206 | 12% |
| Engineering | 100 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 76 | 4% |
| Other | 444 | 25% |
| Unknown | 263 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 688. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#31,204
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#24
of 9,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155
of 225,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.