↓ Skip to main content

Microscopic approach to coupled-channels effects on fusion

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Microscopic approach to coupled-channels effects on fusion
Published in
Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, December 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevc.88.064604
Authors

C. Simenel, M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, E. Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 75%
Unspecified 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#9,881,820
of 12,378,950 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics
#614
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,220
of 170,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics
#17
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,378,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.