↓ Skip to main content

Let’s get back to work: survival analysis on the return-to-work after depression

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Let’s get back to work: survival analysis on the return-to-work after depression
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s49883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pepijn Vemer, Clazien A Bouwmans, Moniek C Zijlstra-Vlasveld, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen

Abstract

Absence from work due to mental disorders is substantial. Additionally, long-term absence from work is associated with a reduced probability of return-to-work (RTW). Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent condition in Dutch occupational health care settings. An early estimate of the prognosis regarding RTW in patients with MDD could serve both as a point of departure for the identification of high-risk cases and as an instrument to monitor the course of the disorder and of RTW. In the current study, we aimed to assess the added value of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and severity of depression to predict the time to RTW.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Professor 7 7%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,929,388
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#873
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,636
of 219,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#13
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.