↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Should it be universally available?

Overview of attention for article published in Maturitas, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Should it be universally available?
Published in
Maturitas, May 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su-Hsin Chang, Carolyn R.T. Stoll, Graham A. Colditz

Abstract

This paper is the first to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses of bariatric surgery comparing obese patients with obesity-related diseases to obese people without comorbidities across different BMI categories, using the meta-analysis results of surgery outcomes for our effectiveness inputs. We find that surgery treatment is in general cost-effective for people whose BMI is greater than 35 kg/m(2) with or without obesity-related comorbidities, and it is even cost-saving for super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)) with obesity-related comorbidities. Our results also suggest that surgery can be cost-effective for the mildly obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). The bottom line is that bariatric surgery should be universally available to all classes of obese people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,373,510
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Maturitas
#766
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,375
of 123,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maturitas
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.