You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individual Variation in Lipidomic Profiles of Healthy Subjects in Response to Omega-3 Fatty Acids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0076575 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malin L. Nording, Jun Yang, Katrin Georgi, Christine Hegedus Karbowski, J. Bruce German, Robert H. Weiss, Ronald J. Hogg, Johan Trygg, Bruce D. Hammock, Angela M. Zivkovic |
| Abstract |
Conflicting findings in both interventional and observational studies have resulted in a lack of consensus on the benefits of ω3 fatty acids in reducing disease risk. This may be due to individual variability in response. We used a multi-platform lipidomic approach to investigate both the consistent and inconsistent responses of individuals comprehensively to a defined ω3 intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| Canada | 4 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,460,787
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,803
of 225,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,596
of 225,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#988
of 5,161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.