↓ Skip to main content

Colonization resistance: The deconvolution of a complex trait

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
patent
3 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colonization resistance: The deconvolution of a complex trait
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, April 2017
DOI 10.1074/jbc.r116.752295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin E Olsan, Mariana X Byndloss, Franziska Faber, Fabian Rivera-Chávez, Renée M Tsolis, Andreas J Bäumler

Abstract

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae are an emerging threat to hospitals worldwide and antibiotic exposure is a risk factor for developing fecal carriage that may lead to nosocomial infection. Here we review how antibiotics reduce colonization resistance against Enterobacteriaceae to pinpoint possible control points for curbing their spread. Recent work identifies host-derived respiratory electron acceptors as a critical resource driving a post-antibiotic expansion of Enterobacteriaceae within the large bowel. By providing a conceptual framework for colonization resistance against Enterobacteriaceae, these mechanistic insights point to the metabolism of epithelial cells as a possible target for intervention strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 35 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,427,565
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#809
of 85,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,928
of 324,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#13
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.