↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Regulatory SNPs in Human Genome Using ChIP-seq ENCODE Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of Regulatory SNPs in Human Genome Using ChIP-seq ENCODE Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonid O. Bryzgalov, Elena V. Antontseva, Marina Yu. Matveeva, Alexander G. Shilov, Elena V. Kashina, Viatcheslav A. Mordvinov, Tatyana I. Merkulova

Abstract

A vast amount of SNPs derived from genome-wide association studies are represented by non-coding ones, therefore exacerbating the need for effective identification of regulatory SNPs (rSNPs) among them. However, this task remains challenging since the regulatory part of the human genome is annotated much poorly as opposed to coding regions. Here we describe an approach aggregating the whole set of ENCODE ChIP-seq data in order to search for rSNPs, and provide the experimental evidence of its efficiency. Its algorithm is based on the assumption that the enrichment of a genomic region with transcription factor binding loci (ChIP-seq peaks) indicates its regulatory function, and thereby SNPs located in this region are more likely to influence transcription regulation. To ensure that the approach preferably selects functionally meaningful SNPs, we performed enrichment analysis of several human SNP datasets associated with phenotypic manifestations. It was shown that all samples are significantly enriched with SNPs falling into the regions of multiple ChIP-seq peaks as compared with the randomly selected SNPs. For experimental verification, 40 SNPs falling into overlapping regions of at least 7 TF binding loci were selected from OMIM. The effect of SNPs on the binding of the DNA fragments containing them to the nuclear proteins from four human cell lines (HepG2, HeLaS3, HCT-116, and K562) has been tested by EMSA. A radical change in the binding pattern has been observed for 29 SNPs, besides, 6 more SNPs also demonstrated less pronounced changes. Taken together, the results demonstrate the effective way to search for potential rSNPs with the aid of ChIP-seq data provided by ENCODE project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,771,330
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,447
of 194,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,740
of 212,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,135
of 5,131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.