↓ Skip to main content

An Evolutionary Cascade Model for Sauropod Dinosaur Gigantism - Overview, Update and Tests

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Evolutionary Cascade Model for Sauropod Dinosaur Gigantism - Overview, Update and Tests
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078573
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Martin Sander

Abstract

Sauropod dinosaurs are a group of herbivorous dinosaurs which exceeded all other terrestrial vertebrates in mean and maximal body size. Sauropod dinosaurs were also the most successful and long-lived herbivorous tetrapod clade, but no abiological factors such as global environmental parameters conducive to their gigantism can be identified. These facts justify major efforts by evolutionary biologists and paleontologists to understand sauropods as living animals and to explain their evolutionary success and uniquely gigantic body size. Contributions to this research program have come from many fields and can be synthesized into a biological evolutionary cascade model of sauropod dinosaur gigantism (sauropod gigantism ECM). This review focuses on the sauropod gigantism ECM, providing an updated version based on the contributions to the PLoS ONE sauropod gigantism collection and on other very recent published evidence. The model consist of five separate evolutionary cascades ("Reproduction", "Feeding", "Head and neck", "Avian-style lung", and "Metabolism"). Each cascade starts with observed or inferred basal traits that either may be plesiomorphic or derived at the level of Sauropoda. Each trait confers hypothetical selective advantages which permit the evolution of the next trait. Feedback loops in the ECM consist of selective advantages originating from traits higher in the cascades but affecting lower traits. All cascades end in the trait "Very high body mass". Each cascade is linked to at least one other cascade. Important plesiomorphic traits of sauropod dinosaurs that entered the model were ovipary as well as no mastication of food. Important evolutionary innovations (derived traits) were an avian-style respiratory system and an elevated basal metabolic rate. Comparison with other tetrapod lineages identifies factors limiting body size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 25%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Other 7 7%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 37 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#149,247
of 24,185,663 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,257
of 208,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,084
of 217,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#50
of 5,095 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,185,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,095 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.