↓ Skip to main content

CPORT: A Consensus Interface Predictor and Its Performance in Prediction-Driven Docking with HADDOCK

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CPORT: A Consensus Interface Predictor and Its Performance in Prediction-Driven Docking with HADDOCK
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sjoerd J. de Vries, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin

Abstract

Macromolecular complexes are the molecular machines of the cell. Knowledge at the atomic level is essential to understand and influence their function. However, their number is huge and a significant fraction is extremely difficult to study using classical structural methods such as NMR and X-ray crystallography. Therefore, the importance of large-scale computational approaches in structural biology is evident. This study combines two of these computational approaches, interface prediction and docking, to obtain atomic-level structures of protein-protein complexes, starting from their unbound components.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 283 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 18%
Student > Bachelor 51 17%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 60 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 97 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 23%
Chemistry 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 70 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,213
of 194,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,226
of 108,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,230
of 1,438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.