↓ Skip to main content

Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy compared with routine care on self-reported health status, general well-being, diabetes-specific quality of life and treatment satisfaction in screen-de…

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy compared with routine care on self-reported health status, general well-being, diabetes-specific quality of life and treatment satisfaction in screen-detected type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial
Published in
Diabetologia, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00125-013-3011-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maureen Van den Donk, Simon J. Griffin, Rebecca K. Stellato, Rebecca K. Simmons, Annelli Sandbæk, Torsten Lauritzen, Kamlesh Khunti, Melanie J. Davies, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Nicholas J. Wareham, Guy E. H. M. Rutten

Abstract

The study aimed to examine the effects of intensive treatment (IT) vs routine care (RC) on patient-reported outcomes after 5 years in screen-detected diabetic patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 12 8%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 31%
Psychology 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,472,047
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,649
of 5,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,168
of 210,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#25
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.