You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients on extracorporeal lung support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-3023-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan Braune, Susanne Kienast, Johannes Hadem, Olaf Wiesner, Dominic Wichmann, Axel Nierhaus, Marcel Simon, Tobias Welte, Stefan Kluge |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients on an extracorporeal lung assist device requiring therapeutic anticoagulation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 26% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,181,583
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,819
of 4,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,458
of 198,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#28
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.