↓ Skip to main content

Virus Encoded MHC-Like Decoys Diversify the Inhibitory KIR Repertoire

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Virus Encoded MHC-Like Decoys Diversify the Inhibitory KIR Repertoire
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Carrillo-Bustamante, Can Keşmir, Rob J. de Boer

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are circulating lymphocytes that play an important role in the control of viral infections and tumors. Their functions are regulated by several activating and inhibitory receptors. A subset of these receptors in human NK cells are the killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs), which interact with the highly polymorphic MHC class I molecules. One important function of NK cells is to detect cells that have down-regulated MHC expression (missing-self). Because MHC molecules have non polymorphic regions, their expression could have been monitored with a limited set of monomorphic receptors. Surprisingly, the KIR family has a remarkable genetic diversity, the function of which remains poorly understood. The mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) is able to evade NK cell responses by coding "decoy" molecules that mimic MHC class I. This interaction was suggested to have driven the evolution of novel NK cell receptors. Inspired by the MCMV system, we develop an agent-based model of a host population infected with viruses that are able to evolve MHC down-regulation and decoy molecules. Our simulations show that specific recognition of MHC class I molecules by inhibitory KIRs provides excellent protection against viruses evolving decoys, and that the diversity of inhibitory KIRs will subsequently evolve as a result of the required discrimination between host MHC molecules and decoy molecules.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 34%
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,479
of 8,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,805
of 222,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#112
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.