You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How confidence intervals become confusion intervals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James McCormack, Ben Vandermeer, G Michael Allan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 284 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 67 | 24% |
| United States | 40 | 14% |
| Canada | 18 | 6% |
| Australia | 12 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Chile | 5 | 2% |
| Sweden | 4 | 1% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 97 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 152 | 54% |
| Scientists | 68 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 48 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 175 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Professor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 52 | 27% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 24% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#213,056
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#11
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,531
of 226,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.