You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An ethnobotanical survey of plants used to manage HIV/AIDS opportunistic infections in Katima Mulilo, Caprivi region, Namibia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-6-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazhila C Chinsembu, Marius Hedimbi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Namibia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,321,307
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#264
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,469
of 107,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.