↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0740-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seong-Ho Kong, Byung-Mo Oh, Hongman Yoon, Hye Seong Ahn, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Sun Geun Chung, Norio Shiraishi, Seigo Kitano, Han-Kwang Yang

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of a three-dimensional (3D) imaging system on laparoscopy performance compared with the conventional 2D system using a novel one-camera 3D system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 31%
Engineering 20 19%
Computer Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,781
of 6,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,362
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.