↓ Skip to main content

Locoregional therapy in luminal-like and HER2-enriched patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Locoregional therapy in luminal-like and HER2-enriched patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer
Published in
SpringerPlus, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng-Yu Chen, Skye Hung-Chun Cheng, Chen-Fang Hung, Ben-Long Yu, Chii-Ming Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#932
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,322
of 213,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#53
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.