You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The food choice at work study: effectiveness of complex workplace dietary interventions on dietary behaviours and diet-related disease risk - study protocol for a clustered controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-14-370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Geaney, Jessica Scotto Di Marrazzo, Clare Kelly, Anthony P Fitzgerald, Janas M Harrington, Ann Kirby, Ken McKenzie, Birgit Greiner, Ivan J Perry |
| Abstract |
Dietary behaviour interventions have the potential to reduce diet-related disease. Ample opportunity exists to implement these interventions in the workplace. The overall aim is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of complex dietary interventions focused on environmental dietary modification alone or in combination with nutrition education in large manufacturing workplace settings. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 262 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 10% |
| Psychology | 15 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 22% |
| Unknown | 70 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,864,643
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,040
of 5,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,560
of 280,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#40
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.